
4.29.2009
4.28.2009
Public Enemies by Bryan Burrough

“In 600 days the modern FBI was born. This is the story of how it happened.” (page 9, hardcover.)
This is a very dense book. Burrough’s provided us with a glut of information - using overlapping timelines to keep it straight. It’s probably the most efficient way to get the story across and create tension and suspense...Bonnie's dying from a car-fire and across the country four other Yeggs (what the FBI called Bank Robbers) are doing dastardly deeds including kidnapping, springing their buddies from jail, gunning down lawmen, and taking vacations. (Who knew Hot Springs Arkansas used to be where all the Cool Kids went?) Burroughs has also given us copious bibliographical references and footnotes to ensure no stone is left unturned. And no stone is - we even get childhood backgrounds where they’re available.
There are awesome facts that you might never know, given the way Hollywood likes to spin things. For instance: Bonnie and Clyde were nowhere near as cute as the movie made them out to be. They never earned much fame when they were alive and many of their “peers” felt they didn’t deserve it after they died. I actually believe that if it weren’t for Bonnie’s poetry, they might have faded into obscurity outside of Dallas. Ma Barker was *not* the Criminal Mastermind the FBI made her out to be. And it was the FBI that did it. They needed someone people could throw stones at and they chose her (something that I suspect the government has done many times - before and since Ma Barker had her 15 minutes.) And that’s just the first 60 pages.
At the beginning of the book - before the prologue - there are timelines, family trees, and maps. You’ll need those. In the middle of the book are a bunch of photos, which is handy and enlightening. Burrough covers everyone from little known petty thieves to Machine Gun Kelly to Pretty Boy Floyd to John Dillinger…there’s even a brush with Murder, Inc.
Confession: every time someone mentions Dillinger I go to this quote from High Fidelity:
“John Dillinger was killed behind that theater in a hale of FBI gunfire. And do you know who tipped them off? His fucking girlfriend. All he wanted to do was go to the movies.”
Like any good gangster buff I knew of Dillinger before the movie came out, but that phrasing resonates.
Sometimes it reads like a gossip column, sometimes like a history text, and often like a how-to manual: How to Rob A Bank/Stage a Kidnapping in the Days Before Television, Amber Alerts, Motion Censors, Mobile Phones, and a Budgeted FBI. It’s chock full of information that criss-crosses the country. Try not to be too amused at an essentially impotent FBI, although some of the “Truth” about our Notorious Heroes did make me laugh out loud. This book is well worth reading, but it’s an investment in your time, and it’s hard to hold up in the bath.
I can’t wait to see how it translates to the big screen.
4.22.2009
Public Enemies, the Trailer
I'm about a third of the way through this bad boy...and if the movie is half as good as the book (and with that cast, how can it not be?) it's going to be AWESOME.
Movies
I think I'm going to add another facet to this. Actually, I already have. It's still primarily books, but since movie adaptions are sometimes awesome (Fight Club, Archangel) and sometimes horrifying (Starship Troopers)...they deserve their own reviews.
So, my self-imposed rules are:
1) I'm only reviewing movies based on books that I have reviewed on this site.
2) As soon as a book that I have read or am planning to read has a trailer, I'll post it so that if you are - like me - a Read The Book Before Seeing the Movie person, you'll have a heads-up.
3) The only tags said posts will get is either "movie" or "trailer" and then in the post I will link to the original book review.
I think that covers it.
Any other requests?
So, my self-imposed rules are:
1) I'm only reviewing movies based on books that I have reviewed on this site.
2) As soon as a book that I have read or am planning to read has a trailer, I'll post it so that if you are - like me - a Read The Book Before Seeing the Movie person, you'll have a heads-up.
3) The only tags said posts will get is either "movie" or "trailer" and then in the post I will link to the original book review.
I think that covers it.
Any other requests?
Archangel, the movie

When I finished the book, one of the first things I did was check imdb to see if there was a movie. And, yes. There is. Made for the BBC and starring Daniel Craig. It came out in 2004, which meant that Netflix could provide me with my very own DVD to watch. So husband and I settled down with some dinner to watch.
The casting is spot-on. The story follows the book closely enough that I had no problems where it diverged...ok, a little at the end, but when the movie wrapped I was good with it. The crew tweaked what they needed to for purposes of continuity, time, and probably budget. You can tell when they move from "on location" to a soundstage. It's not bad, though. It's BBC.
I lied a little about the casting. Daniel Craig as Fluke Kelso is excellent. A little prettier than the Fluke in my head, but they "normalized" him so I feel like it was a nice compromise. Yekaterina Rednikova is a million times prettier than I imagined Zinaida. Not that I thought Zinaida was ugly in the book, not by any means. But she is, essentially, an orphan who spends half her time pursuing her law degree and the other half of her time being a high-class whore. If anything she should have been more tired.
And also - the guy who played Stalin. Creepy. Scary. Spot-on. The man was insane and the actor captured it. Shudder.
So, it's a movie-based-on-a-book that's worth watching, in my opinion. But read the book first. Because Harris is a genius, I tell you. A GENIUS.
Promo:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)